Aliens vs Predator: Requiem
The once mighty Alien and Predator franchises are reduced to direct-to-video status with this largely worthless exercise in making money from nothing
It is with some alarm that I realise how long ago it was that I first got hooked on the Alien franchise. Back then, of course, it was just the one film. A film that I was too young to see (I eventually caught up with it on its television premiere), but one which caught my imagination and had cinemagoers in a frenzy of horror and excitement.
H.R.Giger's unique design for the alien creature has made it the ultimate movie monster in many peoples' minds. A creature that not only terrifies on the screen, but is unsettling to even look at. This is part of the reason why the Alien franchise has lasted so long. The other part is the incredible foundation that Ridley Scott and James Cameron built - two strikingly different films, each equally influential and career-making.
Sadly David Fincher's much maligned third entry was sorely compromised by, well, that's another story. Suffice to say that Fincher's later output, and the flashes of brilliance in Alien3, have given a clear sign that the third entry could have been just as magnificent as its predecessors.
The same can't really be said for Alien Resurrection, which amply demonstrated how it's possible to make a bad film from a good script. Despite some good ideas the rot had already set in by this point.
Meanwhile the Predator franchise had started promisingly at the hands of John McTiernan and Arnold Schwarzenegger, and then also fizzled out with the lacklustre sequel.
It took comic publishers Dark Horse to merge the two and, to all intents and purposes, keep the twin franchises alive. The premise worked perfectly - the aliens were unstoppable killing machines, the predators were hunters out for the ultimate fight - it was as if they were made for each other.
While Twentieth Century Fox stalled on the prospect of an Alien 5 (presumably wary at the thought of making a film that might actually require imagination and creativity) the studio did finally give birth to the Alien vs Predator screen franchise in 2004. The film might have been financially successful but it failed in almost every other area.
Finally this brings us to Aliens vs Predator: Requiem - the second entry in this hybrid franchise. Given the issues many people had with Alien vs Predator there were strong hopes that the sequel would be an improvement. Signs were good at first. Whereas the first outing was sanitised in a bizarre ploy to attract a family audience, the new film would be appropriately targeted at 'mature' audiences. Furthermore, the directors of the sequel - the Brothers Strause - openly voiced their admiration for James Cameron's Aliens, suggesting that an all-out action fest would ensue. Indeed the trailers actually looked quite promising.
Then they made their first mistake - they released the film. (Actually the first mistake was making it at all, but at least audiences could pretend there was hope while the film remained unseen.). Reviews were, if anything, even more scathing than those for Paul W.S.Anderson's awful first attempt.
Of course, the horror genre has a long and notorious history of poorly conceived sequels that have little function other than to make money. This is ultimately a self-defeating process as these sequels are often so poor that the franchise is progressively devalued until it eventually becomes impossible for the studio to make any more money out of it.
Some franchises just about manage to remain immune to this process. The James Bond series has successfully reinvented itself time and again. The Harry Potter films just seem to get better and better. These examples are few and far between, but I'm sure I wasn't alone in hoping that the Alien franchise was somewhat untouchable. I was wrong.